NZ Taxonomy

A sustainable finance taxonomy is a classification system. It labels and establishes credible criteria for economic activities based on their contributions to meeting environmental goals.

The NZ Taxonomy provides a clear, science-based framework to define which economic activities are aligned to, or enable substantial progress towards, a low-emissions, resilient future for Aotearoa New Zealand.

CSF, in partnership with the New Zealand Government, is working to create a sustainable finance taxonomy for Aotearoa New Zealand (the NZ Taxonomy). 

The NZ Taxonomy create a common language between investors and businesses and intends to flow capital to activities which support Aotearoa New Zealand’s transition to a low-emissions, resilient economy, while safeguarding other environmental and social objectives.

The NZ Taxonomy makes it easier to assess the sustainability credentials of an activity or investment, thereby lowering associated costs and greenwashing risk. For businesses, the NZ Taxonomy can be used to distinguish activities that could be relevant for a broader range of financing structures offered by lenders or investors. 

Work is under way to develop classifications and criteria for activities that contribute to the goals of climate change mitigation, adaptation and resilience, in three sectors: 

Expressions of interest: Energy sector Technical Advisory Group

The NZ Taxonomy is now taking expressions of interest to join the sector-specific Technical Advisory Groups (TAGs) for the Energy sector and Construction and Buildings sectors. 

The TAGs provide technical inputs to developing the criteria for each sector, and ensuring they are both credible and practical. 

We seek a range of perspectives in the TAGs, including from those with experience from industry, civil society, iwi and Māori organisations, policy, and academia. Sectorial experts in these areas are invited to apply

Energy sector EoI is open until 5pm NZT, Friday 10 October. All applicants will be notified by 24 October.

NZ Taxonomy consultation on adaptation and resilience criteria

The second public consultation on the draft criteria for climate change adaptation and resilience, as well as the updated climate change mitigation criteria, is now open.

Consultation closes 5pm NZT, Friday 17 October. 

This consultation includes updated criteria for climate change mitigation, based on the feedback received in the June public consultation. It also includes the new climate change adaptation and resilience criteria, available for public feedback for the first time.

The climate change adaptation and resilience criteria broaden the options for NZ Taxonomy-alignment and possible finance options for activities which help businesses adapt to the impacts of climate change and increase their resilience. 

We welcome feedback from all stakeholders on these criteria. 

NZ Taxonomy purpose

The long-term prosperity and resilience of Aotearoa New Zealand depends on transitioning to a low-emissions economy, but domestic organisations will need finance to do so. 

Taxonomies are developed or being developed in 53 jurisdictions globally. As an optional capital market, a domestically relevant taxonomy is intended to help NZ businesses access global capital for transition. It can also support efficient market access by ensuring NZ businesses are using frameworks recognisable to markets, customers and regulators globally. 

The NZ Taxonomy also plays a crucial role in expanding the visibility and credibility of transition activities, where the path towards low-emissions is complex and gradual.

The purpose of the NZ Taxonomy is to enable market participants to mobilise and direct capital flows towards: 

  • Building a low-emissions, Paris-aligned future;
  • Restoring nature; and
  • Upholding the rights and interests of Indigenous Peoples of the land
 
Read more about the purpose of the NZ Taxonomy here.

Setting the record straight.

There’s been commentary lately making inaccurate claims about the NZ Taxonomy. Let’s be clear: the taxonomy is not about compliance or telling farmers how to run their businesses. It is a voluntary, market-led tool to help investors identify ‘green’ or ‘sustainable’ activities in New Zealand. It’s about growing access to global capital, not adding green tape. ‘Taxonomy’ simply means classification – nothing to do with tax.

The New Zealand Government has objectives of doubling the value of exports while staying in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement, growing and building resilience into the economy. The NZ Taxonomy is about growing New Zealand access to global capital and markets.

Listen to our Chief Executive, Jo Kelly, set the record straight on The Rural Roundup radio.

Questions and feedback are welcome – this tool is still in development – but let’s base the conversation on facts. To read our detailed response to the claims recently leveled by industry groups, read this PDF.

Process and governance

The NZ Taxonomy is being developed through a robust and credible process that was established in alignment with leading international efforts in designing local taxonomies.

This process includes the involvement of a diverse range of expertise, strong governance, regulatory oversight, transparency, opportunity for public input and safeguards against undue political or industry interference. 

The process includes two types of working group: 

  • Sector-specific Technical Advisory Groups (TAGs) – these sector-specific group provides technical inputs to develop the substantial contribution criteria for each sector, as well as the activity specific DNSH for these sectors. 
  • Technical Experts Group (TEG) – this group is overseeing the development of the entire NZ Taxonomy and are focused on usability, interoperability and ensuring the NZ Taxonomy delivers on its intended purpose. 

The development work is overseen by the Ministry for the Environment, with quality assurance of the process being provided by the Council of Financial Regulators. 

CSF provides coordination and secretariat functions for the development of the NZ Taxonomy. 

CSF has engaged the Climate Bonds Initiative (CBI) as the technical partners for the NZ Taxonomy development. CBI have contributed to the development of more than twenty sustainable finance taxonomies globally, including in the EU, Singapore, Brazil and Australia. 

Additionally, throughout the process there has been input from and engagement with a wide range of stakeholders, including government officials, research organisations, industry bodies, real economy participants, iwi and Māori organisations, and environmental NGOs. 

The NZ Taxonomy coordinates with the development of taxonomies in other jurisdictions internationally, and particularly with Australia.

Development timeline

  • Oct 2024 – TEG and Agriculture/Forestry TAG established.
  • Nov 2024 – TEG and Agriculture/Forestry TAG meetings began.
  • Mar 2025 – Methodological approach finalised, with CoFR review.
  • Jun 2025 – First public consultation opened on the draft NZ Taxonomy Agriculture and Forestry climate change mitigation criteria. CoFR review.
  • Sep 2025 – Energy TAG EoI opens.
  • Sep 2025 – Second public consultation opened for Agriculture and Forestry, including climate change adaptation and resilience criteria. CoFR review.
  • Oct 2025 – Energy TAG established and commences work.
  • Nov 2025 – Construction and Buildings TAG EoI opens.
  • Dec 2025 – Jan 2026 – Final criteria report for Agriculture and Forestry sectors. CoFR review.
  • Feb 2026 – Construction and Buildings TAG established and commences work.
  • Jun 2026 – Public consultation opens on draft NZ Taxonomy criteria for Energy sector climate change mitigation adaptation and resilience criteria. CoFR review.
  • Jul 2026 – Public consultation opens on draft NZ Taxonomy criteria for Construction and Buildings sector climate change mitigation adaptation and resilience criteria. CoFR review.
  • Nov/Dec 2026 – Final NZ Taxonomy for three sectors published.

Engage with the NZ Taxonomy Development

There are several ways to stay informed and give your feedback as the NZ Taxonomy develops. Register for updates, using the form at the bottom of the page, to get the latest news. Join us for public webinars at key points in the development process. 

NZ Taxonomy Introduction Webinar

Dec 2, 2024

Public consultation #1 preparation

May 7, 2025

Summary of public consultation #1 feedback

Aug 6, 2025

Public consultation #2: adaptation and resilience

Sept 22, 2025

CSF is also undertaking appropriate engagement through targeted consultation with stakeholders affected by the Taxonomy across the financial sector, agriculture and forestry industries, environmental NGOs and with iwi and relevant Māori organisations. If your organisation would like a briefing, please email [email protected]

The Technical Expert Group

The Technical Expert Group (TEG) oversees the development of the NZ Taxonomy. It serves as an intermediary between the Technical Advisory Groups (TAGs), the lead agency, Ministry for the Environment (the Ministry), and the Government quality assurance function. The TEG offers strategic direction, input, and endorsement of all technical taxonomy methodologies and definitions, ensuring usability, interoperability and alignment with Ministerial direction on taxonomy design and that they are fit-for-purpose for NZ.

Technical Expert Group Members

 

TEG co-Chairs

  1. Andy Reisinger, Independent Climate Change Expert
  2. Pip Best, Partner – Climate Change & Sustainability Services, EY Oceania

 

TEG members

  1. Adam Coxhead, Head of Sustainable Finance, Bank of New Zealand
  2. Amelia Sharman, Director – Sustainability Reporting, External Reporting Board (XRB) (from July 2025)
  3. Caroline Poujol, Director – Sustainable Finance (NZ), ANZ
  4. David Hall, Policy Director, Toha Network
  5. David Woods, Independent
  6. Feng Hu, International Specialist, United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative (UNEP FI); Founder and Director, silkroad.earth
  7. Fonteyn Moses-Te Kani, Pou Tiaki – Director Māori Strategy & Indigenous Inclusion, Westpac New Zealand
  8. Greg Munford, Senior Investment Strategist – Sustainable Investment, New Zealand Superannuation Fund
  9. James Paterson, Head of Sustainable Finance, ASB
  10. Jeremie Madamour, Principal Advisor – Climate Change & Sustainability Reporting, External Reporting Board (XRB) (until July 2025)
  11. Joanna Silver, Head of Sustainable Finance, Westpac New Zealand
  12. Jono Broome, Associate Director – Client Advisory APAC, Morningstar Sustainalytics
  13. Jorge Waayman, Manager – ESG Research, Harbour Asset Management
  14. Julia Langley, Managing Director – Switzerland & New Zealand, Green Wave Advisory
  15. June McCabe, Independent Director; Pou Tahua Representative, National Iwi Chairs Forum (NICF)
  16. Sean Fullan, Resilience and Recovery Manager, Insurance Council of New Zealand (ICNZ)
  17. Stefan Gray, Manager – Strategic Climate Initiatives, Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ)

 

Observer

  1. Allison Hancock, Partner, MinterEllisonRuddWatts

The Agriculture / Forestry Sector-Specific Technical Advisory Group

The Agriculture/Forestry Technical Advisory Group (TAG) provides technical input into the methodologies and definitions of a sustainable finance taxonomy that is fit-for-purpose for NZ.

CSF has also undertaken extensive engagement with stakeholders affected by the taxonomy across the financial sector, agriculture and forestry industries, environmental NGOs, science and research bodies, and with iwi and relevant Māori organisations.

We thank everyone who has contributed valuable feedback and inputs throughout this process.

Agriculture & Forestry Technical Advisory Group (TAG) Members has included:

 

TAG members

  1. Andrew Dunningham, Research Group Leader – Economics & Society, Scion
  2. Anita Wreford, Professor, Lincoln University
  3. Charles Taituha, Whenua Māori Trustee, Te Kukuwai o Kahuwera & Pukemakoiti Trust
  4. Dan Coup, Chief Executive, QEII National Trust
  5. Elizabeth Rose Heeg, Chief Executive, New Zealand Forest Owners Association (NZFOA); Chief Executive, Forest Growers Levy Trust
  6. Gavin Marshall, Sustainability Manager, Rabobank New Zealand
  7. Glenn Moir, Owner and Director, Forest Management Group; Chair, Canterbury West Coast Wood Council (CWCWC); Director, Forever Forests
  8. Graeme Doole, Science Group Manager – Ethical Agriculture, AgResearch
  9. Jacqui Aimers, Trustee, Tāne’s Tree Trust; Research Analyst, Forestry Scientist and Ecologist, Aimers Consulting
  10. Jeff Ilott, Executive Director, New Zealand Timber Industry Federation (NZTIF); Chief Executive, New Zealand Timber Preservation Council
  11. Jo Horrocks, Chief Resilience & Research Officer, Natural Hazards Commission
  12. Jonathan Procter, Professor in Natural Hazards, Massey University
  13. Kevin Ihaka, Managing Director, Forest Protection Services Trust, FPS Geospatial, FPS Forestry
  14. Klaeri Schelhowe, Founder and Managing Director, Scheddebrock
  15. Lee Matheson, Principal Consultant and Managing Director, Perrin Ag Consultants
  16. Manu Caddie, Co-Founder and Managing Director, Matawai Bio; Founder and Managing Director, IO Ltd; Managing Director, Hikurangi Bioactives LP; Managing Trustee, Kānuka Charitable Trust
  17. Marcus Bousfield, Regional Manager – Business, ANZ
  18. Marie Henniges, Senior Associate – Climate Risk & Resilience, Howden
  19. Nicholas Tait, Senior Partnership Lead – Future Fit Farm Systems, Dairy New Zealand
  20. Peter Savage, Director – Sustainable Finance, BNZ
  21. Philip Wiles, Senior Manager – Climate Risk, Kiwibank
  22. Roger Dungan, General Manager – Strategic Partnerships & Communication, Scion
  23. Sally Garden, Project Director, Climate Change Commissi
  24. Scott Burnett, Regional Conservation Manager and Climate & Forestry Advocacy Lead, Forest & Bird
  25. Simon Love, Head of Sustainability Assurance, AsureQuality
  26. Stuart Taylor, General Manager – Farming, Craigmore Sustainables
  27. Terina Williams, Senior Investment Strategist – Sustainable Investment, New Zealand Superannuation Fund
  28. Turi McFarlane, Head of Rural Sustainability, ASB

 

Observer

  1. Kevin Prime, Beef Farmer, Forester, Beekeeper and Conservationist; Former Environment Court Commissioner

NZ Taxonomy publications

Developing a Sustainable Finance Taxonomy for Aotearoa New Zealand

In 2023-2024, CSF convened an Independent Technical Advisory Group (ITAG) to develop key design recommendations for the NZ Taxonomy. The resulting recommendations report, covering ten key topics, was presented to the Minister of Climate Change and made public in July 2024.

Recommendations Report

PDF

Executive
Summary

PDF

Frequently asked questions

Why does NZ need a sustainable finance taxonomy?

An Aotearoa New Zealand Sustainable Finance Taxonomy (NZ Taxonomy) provides recognisable definitions that can be used by investors and capital providers who want to make investments into the global transition to a low emissions economy. 

Over 50 jurisdictions are developing taxonomies. NZ’s approach is to closely align to the Australian Taxonomy, adapting international definitions to fit our business, legal and policy environment. Being an importer of capital, these definitions need to be recognisable, credible and relevant to investors, while being applicable and suitable in the NZ context. 

A common language and approach is preferable to individual organisations creating their own definitions. The standardisation will reduce friction and accelerate the pace and scale of capital flow towards better outcomes. 

While taxonomies don’t provide a complete solution, they are vital tools that financial institutions and Government can use to direct capital towards more sustainable outcomes. 

Taxonomies offer broader benefits – they help prevent greenwashing, guide Government incentives, attract international green capital, and align with key trading partners’ regulations/standards. 

Why can’t NZ just use the international ones from Europe or Australia?

The NZ Taxonomy prioritises interoperability and harmonisation with global standards. It will be closely aligned to the Australian approach, which also follows the principle of ensuring credibility and harmonisation.

What is the role of CSF in the NZ Taxonomy?

CSF is a taxonomy development partner and will coordinate the process, technical delivery and stakeholder engagement for the NZ Taxonomy. CSF is not the decision-maker on the various aspects e.g. substantial contribution screening criteria, do no significant harm criteria, and minimum social safeguards.

What is the role of the Government?

The role of the Government is to provide legitimacy to the process and to provide a predictable source of funding to guarantee a stable environment for the development of the NZ Taxonomy.

Importantly, the Government does not drive the development of the NZ Taxonomy. Instead, it either accepts or declines to endorse the process, rather than evaluating the quality of criteria developed by the TEG and TAGs. CSF is the liaison between all groups and care is taken to ensure that industry and political influences do not hinder the independence of the body developing the technical screening criteria.

How sector prioritisation was made?

The ITAG, which provided key design recommendations to the Government, advised a priority focus on several key sectors.

When undertaking its sector prioritisation, the ITAG considered factors such as greenhouse gas emissions, relevance to New Zealand’s low-emissions transition, dependence on nature, significance to the Māori economy, contribution to exports, and share of bank lending.

You can find more information on page 17 of the ITAG recommendations report.

Criteria are being developed one sector at a time. Agriculture & forestry, energy, and building & construction are the first priorities, given their vital role in New Zealand’s economy, low-emissions future, and environmental resilience.

What does it mean that the NZ Taxonomy covers climate change mitigation, adaptation and resilience?

Taxonomies prioritise climate change mitigation for several reasons:

  • Measurability: It’s generally easier to determine and quantify substantial contributions that economic activities make to mitigation efforts.

  • Established frameworks: There are already well-established best practices, criteria, and thresholds in the area of climate change mitigation, providing a solid foundation for our work.

Adaptation and resilience are crucial for NZ, however there is currently a lack of international consensus on what constitutes a substantial contribution in these areas, largely because these factors are often highly localised. This makes it difficult to establish standardised criteria that are both globally relevant and locally applicable.

Our approach is to focus on mitigation as an immediate priority, with adaptation and resilience developed at the same time, to the full degree possible, while taxonomies develop internationally. This strategy allows us to move quickly while aligning with the Australian adaptation and resilience criteria for agriculture and land use, as global standards evolve.

How are iwi/Māori perspectives incorporated into the NZ Taxonomy design process?

The members of the independent technical advisory group that made design recommendations on the NZ Taxonomy (the ITAG) unanimously recommended that it reflect New Zealand’s economic advantages and context, by including indigenous rights, interests and knowledge into its design.

The development of the NZ Taxonomy has sought to incorporate iwi/Māori perspectives and knowledge by:

  • Promoting equitable Māori participation and representation in NZ Taxonomy governance, and during each phase of its development.
  • Engaging with Iwi/Māori experts and stakeholders throughout the development process, including through formal engagement with the National Iwi Chairs Forum, to inform both the values and technical aspects of the NZ Taxonomy.

The criteria available for public consultation include iwi/Māori values where relevant, including:

  • Consideration under the substantial contribution (SC) criteria to support/not-exclude culturally appropriate sustainability practices.
  • In the do no significant harm (DNSH) criteria, where a holistic approach to sustainability has been taken by adapting environmental impact assessments to include consideration of cultural impacts.
  • Iwi/Māori rights are recognised as a core pillar – alongside corporate governance and human rights – within the minimum social safeguards (MSS) framework. Consideration for the cultural heritage of all New Zealanders is also included in the MSS.
How were TEG and TAG members selected?

The selection of TEG and TAG members is conducted through an open Expression of Interest (EoI) process. This approach ensures a comprehensive and fair selection, aiming to create diverse groups that effectively represent both the financial services sector and the broader financial ecosystem.

Key aspects of the TEG selection process include:

  • Assessing individual skills, experience, expertise, and networks, as well as potential contributions from the candidate’s organisations.

  • Ensuring a balanced mix of expertise across sustainable finance, climate and environmental science and policy, circular economy, human rights, and indigenous perspectives.

  • Evaluating candidates’ understanding of global and NZ sustainable finance landscapes.

  • Considering ability to commit required time, manage potential conflicts of interest, and collaborate effectively.

  • Prioritising diverse perspectives, including indigenous knowledge and expertise.

For the TAGs, we seek experts from policy, academia, finance, industry, civil society, and iwi/Māori organisations with sector-specific knowledge. These candidates should be able to provide technical insights for developing climate mitigation, adaptation and resilience criteria in their relevant sector.

CSF makes the final selections in consultation with the lead agency, Ministry for the Environment.

Drawing on international experience, financial sector representatives have an important role in ensuring the NZ Taxonomy’s usability, practicality, and impact at the design stage. This input is vital to create a fit-for-purpose NZ Taxonomy that will be widely adopted and achieve its intended impact.

Who decides what’s in or out of the taxonomy?

Typically, recommendations are made by a technical group comprised of relevant experts to an oversight group, which also considers usability and application in the market and determines whether to accept the technical recommendations. From here, the Government has a role in endorsing (or not) the process taken and ultimately in endorsing the taxonomy.

CSF has recommended that integrity safeguards are put in place to protect the process from undue industry or political influence.

Will there be opportunities for stakeholder input and how can people stay up to date with the process as it develops?

Yes, there are three ways to engage: 

  1. Public consultation: The second round on Agriculture and Forestry sector criteria will be open from 22 September to 17 October 2025. Click here for more information.

  2. Join public webinars and/or stakeholder discussion sessions to stay in formed at key phases of the development.

  3. Stay informed: Subscribe below for NZ Taxonomy-related updates. 

What is the difference between Sustainable, Green and Transition Finance?

Sustainable Finance is a broad approach integrating environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations into financial decisions.

Green Finance is for activities aimed at supporting environmentally beneficial projects.

Transition Finance helps high-emitting sectors or entities shift towards low-carbon or net-zero pathways.

See this article for more information, including scope, application and examples from New Zealand.

Subscribe

Enter your name and email address to subscribe.

Close

About

Our Work

Current Work

Past Work

News and resources

Resources