MEDIA: Should directors have to consider all stakeholders?

Written by Nicola Shepheard for NBR

Why are we here? What’s it all about? What do I value?

Such soul-searching can no longer solely be the domain of the young and the philosophically inclined; to do their job properly in today’s world, company directors must ask such questions about the organisation they serve – also, critically, ‘Who am I here for?’

And they must recognise that a clear purpose will drive objectives that serve the interests not only of financial stakeholders (aka shareholders) but non-financial ones too, for the long-term success of the company.

These are key concepts in a whitepaper released today by the Institute of Directors New Zealand (IoD) and law firm MinterEllisonRuddWatts, which IoD author Felicity Caird hopes will stimulate “robust debate” around so-called shareholder primacy (putting returns to shareholders above everything else) and stakeholder interests.

The paper, Stakeholder governance: A call to review directors’ duties, makes a case that the nearly-30-year-old Companies Act 1993, which, among other things, governs directors’ duties, is out of step with the times and ripe for review.

….

This week, Toitū Tahua, The Centre for Sustainable Finance was launched to, in the words of co-chair Bridget Coates, unite, accelerate and encourage further development of the sustainable finance goals articulated by its founding body, the Sustainable Finance Forum in its ‘roadmap’ for future-proofing New Zealand’s financial system.

The Forum an initiative of the Aotearoa Circle, a partnership of public and private sector leaders committed to restoring New Zealand’s environment.

Read the full article here.

Previous
Previous

MEDIA: Business wants to avoid climate change fishbowl

Next
Next

MEDIA: The global momentum for sustainable finance